In the post yesterday u 'Scazzamurrill' posed a question to Sel Sel "If the 'is taken. Here is a crisp repartee.
" (Filome ', but we were doing there?).
I do not understand what you mean by the allusion to which we were doing there and I do not understand what you have said.
You must know that the seat of Left Ecology Liberty has been chosen, according to a turnover, which ... "privileged place" of the official meetings of the center-left parties that have elected Mayor of Torremaggiore Ciancio. The meetings were always attended by all members including Mina for the City.
The reason is clear and transparent meetings, took part, every time we met, even friends of the so-called current "6per" which together with the other members of the coordination of PD have raised doubts on the timetable of the Executive and methods of operation thereof in relation to the programmatic aspects. The meetings were interrupted to allow the Congress of the Democratic Party has elected a new secretary. The debate within the Democratic Party I am passionate but I can not resolve the internal disputes of the currents, or adjust my political action based on sympathy for the Methuselah or for renovators. It 's a problem inside the Democratic Party and the Congress if it was not enough to pave the internal opposition and did not lead to unity, it can hurt me, but it's not my problem. It seems so pretentious pull in dance with an opinion of disapproval. Nor can we condemn the role of the parties that ousted the administrative life but it would probably disappear to avoid arousing suspicion of conspiracy to the detriment of the City? Put things in place in our reasoning clear, come on!
I claim mine and that of other members of CSX to exercise proactive role in understanding the processes under way in the administration and the reasons that slow down your choices that often trivialize or administrative actions that do or prevent progress of the steps for implementing the program. If at a meeting duly convened some do not occur, suspicion of conspiracy can not be saddled with those who chose to participate. These are the facts! The rest is gossip. These days one of the three components that made possible the establishment of this Administration has failed to denounce judgments with words and not all that hard in Government v Ciancio. If the criticism erupted over the attempts of coordination of CSX to hold the situation together, there will also be the reasons for which the Mayor should take note and make them common ground for reflection. But no, do not talk, you pretend that nothing happened, so the numbers are enough to continue. It is not correct and that's not how you can build and sustain a process of clarity. You be the judge saw that recently, for a long time you did the Pontius Pilate. Now you're back, this gives me great pleasure, but avoids wand and tries to talk to everybody and not only with the intimate suffering from "orba partisanship."
PS where is' the parlor that we decided to build during the election campaign? Where are the resolutions to turn good ideas laboratories and political actions? And so on. I feel once again many orphans.
amicably
Filomena
Dear Filomena,
frankly I find it amazing your answer. I find it amazing for as you know, to know how your ideals and commitment that has always characterized your political action. I can not understand why the slightest question triggers a response that piqued. Assuming that there was a criticism in what I wrote, and there was a slight criticism, is it forbidden to criticize when you think Sel Sel has taken a step wrong or unwise?
We enter on the subject. What I have told you is exactly what I wrote and that you confirm: You have taken part in a coordination center. I'll give you act: you have always done. Except that this coordination center was a little 'different, because you took part in just one piece of center. It happened at a time when clearly a conflict is taking place not only within the Democratic Party, the largest party in the coalition, but the entire coalition. Do take note of this thing, and bureaucratically, take part in a meeting without asking what it means to that meeting, in its very composition, can be a legitimate position, but is politically fragile. In light of the fact that you were seated with the portion of the center farther away from you, as confirmed in the coming months.
You talk of a meeting "regularly convened. To me the regular convening of little interest. I'm interested in what the meeting meant. Certainly does not require you to enter the debate within the Democratic Party, for heaven's sake. But in one of the center you belong to, yes. If you see this in a meeting just a piece of the PD, IDV and that's just one piece, I think it's normal to ask if it is not appropriate at least to postpone that meeting, no? At least to see the reasons why. Lacked the list of Mina, mancaca part IDV expressing a counselor, our missing component, missing the list Force Tower, lacked the same mayor who was elected and is part of the center. In short, there is a small component that was absent. Indeed, with regard to the mayor seems that it was not even invited (this is not certain, but as I understand it). If so were, it would be repeated a political snub that we have already seen in the past.
The truth is that this coordination has not been done to try to hold together the situation, but to split it further. What you will not be realized there is a problem. The point here is that the stakes are on the Democratic Party takeover bid, as I am writing for several days. This has split the Democratic Party before, now split the center-left. That meeting it was a plastic representation. And I stress that I'm not talking about conspiracies (as you did), but legitimate political dynamics, which is obviously against me. From these considerations, my question but that we were doing at that meeting? From these considerations the word "inexplicable" locked in your presence.
Still, Ciancio about the mayor, I can assure you that you have the opportunity to talk to you much more easily than me. So, you can request a joint discussion with the mayor with more ease than me. Of course, even if you invite to meetings, it is unlikely that this discussion starts. Unless you want the mayor "takes note" of the debate without "taking part" in the discussion.
As for the reviews that I've pulled on me a moment please to moderate susceptibility. Telling someone who is "Pontius Pilate," just because a few months of his life had other things to do and there has made a simple request, comparing it to a guy who has killed another man lavandosene hands, I think frankly not a proportionate response to the fact that there has been given only a simple question. I'll note that this is the typical reaction of the "Berlusconi's center-left" to move the politically and personally. And just as "Berlusconi" is the non-recognition of the identity of others. When you talk about "so-called" motion "6per" We put a "so-called" too. When you talk about "friends" you put a "fellow" less. If now then you adapt to the phraseology of some members of the Democratic Party, who wanted to pass us as the current "centrist" when in fact that we who performed better than the Democratic Party as an overrun of DS and the Margherita, and therefore we are well to the left of some conservative Democratic Party, this is an issue of mutual recognition that we pose.
So, notwithstanding the friendship, which is something ancient and inviolable, but try to avoid the political mingled at a personal level. I want to feel free to criticize (criticism then? Was little more than a question!) Your own political position, I can not share without having to put in the middle of the friendship.
Antonio
0 comments:
Post a Comment